The official student newspaper of Vanderbilt University

The Vanderbilt Hustler

The official student newspaper of Vanderbilt University.
Since 1888
The official student newspaper of Vanderbilt University

The Vanderbilt Hustler

The official student newspaper of Vanderbilt University.
The official student newspaper of Vanderbilt University

The Vanderbilt Hustler

The official student newspaper of Vanderbilt University.

Can ‘The Great American Lie’ expose America’s empty promises in only 88 minutes?

Jennifer Siebel Newsom’s latest documentary sets out to debunk the American Dream, connecting five narratives to larger political commentary
%28The+Great+American+Lie%2FNetflix%29
(The Great American Lie/Netflix)

The American Dream—the idea that upward social and economic mobility is achievable to all—has been a defining pillar in American ideology since the nation’s founding. Filmmaker Jennifer Siebel Newsom makes it a personal mission to debunk this long-held belief in her latest documentary, “The Great American Lie.” 

According to Newsom, the film “aims to expose social and economic immobility, viewed through the lens of our gendered values.” But this is a topic that our education has barely scratched the surface of, despite our years in lecture halls and countless AP classes in high school. Can her film really supersede them all?

In the film, the assertion is made that equal opportunity is built on the glorification of white men and the oppression of everyone else. Hundreds of years later, she argues this hierarchy is still present in every facet of American life. Newsom explores this sad reality and its intersections with modern wealth disparities by making the claim that American society glorifies jobs that are perceived to be masculine (read: finance, banking and management) and undervalues those perceived to be feminine, like the healthcare, service and education realms.  . 

These different topics are expanded upon by the personal narratives of five independent individuals: a public school principal, a public interest lawyer, a Midwestern steelworker, a social advocate and a single mother seeking to give back to her community. There are also a handful of cameos that range from social justice advocate Bryan Stevenson to Professor of Law at UCLA Kimberlé Crenshaw to Pulitzer Prize winner Nicolas Kristof. 

Again, the film circles back and attempts to tie all of the above into this idea of gendered job sectors.Frankly, it falls short. 

The concepts Newsom introduces are certainly topical and worth discussing, but, unfortunately, this documentary bit off more than it could chew. The scope was too large, and the analysis too shallow. Her efforts in debunking the American Dream are centered around pillars of generational poverty, wealth disparities, mass incarceration, racially biased policing, unfair minimum wage, gender violence and substance abuse. She obviously has hundreds of opportunities to make her case with historical fact, but in such a short timeframe, she fails to make sufficiently profound arguments. 

I am not remotely suggesting that these ties are not present nor that Newsom’s argument isn’t spot-on, rather I am saying to do so in the sub hour-and-a-half run is an impossible feat for anyone. There was far too much content and far too little plot consummation. 

Overall, this documentary poses some very thought provoking questions and prompted me to think about different aspects that cause the American Dream to fail. For this, I found it worth watching but I wish Newsom didn’t attempt to tackle so much because in doing so, it all seemed to fall flat.”The Great American Lie” promised big scandals and a punchy call-to-action with its title, but if you’re looking for a skim-the-surface history lesson, it’s just enough. 

View comments (1)
More to Discover

Comments (1)

The Vanderbilt Hustler welcomes and encourages readers to engage with content and express opinions through the comment sections on our website and social media platforms. The Hustler reserves the right to remove comments that contain vulgarity, hate speech, personal attacks or that appear to be spam, commercial promotion or impersonation. The comment sections are moderated by our Editor-in-Chief, Rachael Perrotta, and our Social Media Director, Chloe Postlewaite. You can reach them at [email protected] and [email protected].
All The Vanderbilt Hustler picks Reader picks Sort: Newest
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
1 Comment
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
D
Daniel M. Gray
3 years ago

I am curious why Ms. Wester did not tell us Ms. Newsom is the second wife of the current governor of California, and that she grew up wealthy in Marin County, CA, and she met her future husband on a ranch they have in MT. Governor Newsom’s family has been so powerful in both San Francisco (where her husband was mayor) and California, that a biography I read of former Governor Edmund “Pat” Brown (1959-67), showed that her husband’s grandfather was Pat Brown’s main fundraiser way back in the 1930s.

Ms. Newsom’s own family consisted of an investment adviser father and a mother connected to the Bay Area arts community, and when did Ms. Newsom ever work with the poor and the downtrodden such that she could learn how they are being denied social mobility in 21st century USA?

Based on her privileged position (I appreciate her having four siblings, as I had eight when I started at VU in 1974), she is uniquely UNQUALIFIED to conduct a documentary on mobility, and only wants to inflict guilt on American citizens for her alleged notion that women are blocked from power.

Women have benefited from affirmative action, which began under Nixon in 1972, far more than blacks, Hispanics and Asians, and as a 64 year old trial attorney I know the US Department of Justice has been hiring two female lawyers for every male lawyer for the past thirty five years. Women have been close to 60% of college graduates for at least two decades, and my law school Washington University in St. Louis had an equal number of men and women when I began law school in 1978.

Despite a late start for women serving in federal office, we now have three female Supreme Court Justices (pending Judge Barrett’s confirmation), we have dozens of women serving on federal appeals courts and as US District Court judges, we have 101 women in the House of Represenatives, and 26 women in the US Senate. Those numbers will only climb higher as women who were close to sixty percent of college graduates reach middle age.

What does Ms. Newsom think about the abortion of so many young women worldwide in places like the PRC and India? That should bother her a lot more than whether a privileged sort with an axe to grind like herself feels property valued. Her husband presides over what was our greatest state in so many ways, and now has become an ungovernable mess of public assistance recipients in the millions, wildfires, non-functioning utilities like Pacific Gas and Electric, and the worst public schools of any state in the Union.

Daniel M. Gray A and S ’78