Skip to Content

RUIZ-ZEPEDA: A dangerous turning point for the worse

Turning Point USA’s record of hateful and discriminatory rhetoric has no logical place at Vanderbilt, bringing dangerous political dialogue to campus.
American flags and notes to Kirk show support, as photographed Sept. 17, 2025. (Hustler Multimedia/Chloe Pryor)
American flags and notes to Kirk show support, as photographed Sept. 17, 2025. (Hustler Multimedia/Chloe Pryor)
Chloe Pryor

Turning Point USA has arrived at Vanderbilt. The worst is yet to come.  

In a statement to The Hustler, RaeAnna Morales, founder of Vanderbilt’s chapter of TPUSA, discussed TPUSA’s goals on Vanderbilt’s campus as promoting free speech and civil debate, specifically how “feelings of disbelief, grief and anger led [her] to realize that freedom of speech and the right to engage in debate are the foundation of America, and they can never be surrendered to fear or violence.”  

In theory, these ideals should appeal to the everyday American. However, mission statements do not exist in a vacuum. Context matters. 

No one deserves to die for expressing their political opinions; political violence has no place in America. However, using that death to expand an organization with a documented record of inflammatory rhetoric defies the principles established by the founders of this country. 

Let’s first tackle the group’s purported mission of free speech. During the 2023 America Fest, Turning Point’s annual conference, the late Charlie Kirk delivered the following remarks: “I have a very, very radical view on this, but I can defend it, and I’ve thought about it. We made a huge mistake when we passed the Civil Rights Act in the 1960s.”  

Kirk made this statement relating to how American politicians interpret the Civil Rights Act when passing legislation, specifically that it has gone beyond its original intent. Although this idea could be true, not one person can determine a baseline for going beyond original intent. That is also why we have the Supreme Court.  

To willingly use this dangerous language, Kirk opens the room for people to share similar views, regressing against the fight for equality in America. The Vanderbilt community deserves to see the type of outlandish behavior stirred from this organization.  

To date, at rallies on college campuses across the country, TPUSA has, on numerous occasions, spread hatred against marginalized communities such as immigrants, people of color and the LGBTQ+ community, among many others. As a predominantly white institution, this puts our minority communities in danger. By enabling TPUSA at Vanderbilt, we enhance visibility of negative rhetoric associated with the national organization, potentially isolating aspects of our student life. 

Take another local Nashville, Tennessee, university, for example. At Belmont University’s monthly TPUSA meetings, students often hold signs stating, “broken borders breed terrorism,” “this nation is rooted in tradition” and “welcome to the spiritual war,” among others. In hindsight, these statements are harmful once analyzed. Broken borders connect immigration entirely with terrorism, portraying people of color or of immigrant descent as inherently dangerous to America. Further, being rooted in tradition suggests sticking to historical norms, resisting social change such as civil rights and social liberty. Lastly, classifying conservatism as inherently “good” according to Christianity is a dangerous use of language, signaling that everyone who does not agree with TPUSA is immoral and dangerous. 

In a petition seeking to remove the chapter from campus with almost 200 signatures, Belmont’s TPUSA is accused of spreading “misinformation and fostering an environment that isn’t conducive to the educational and ethical standards.”  

Returning to Vanderbilt’s chapter’s goals, “Turning Point USA’s mission is to educate students about conservative principles, promote American patriotism and provide opportunities for open debate about political, social and economic ideas,” Morales said. 

The following quotes are from The Charlie Kirk Show, unless otherwise notated. On his show and during his events, Kirk argued over his radical conservative principles, which in turn are those of TPUSA. To the Vanderbilt community: should the following ideologies have a space on our campus? Are they conductive of conservative principles and American patriotism? 

“Happening all the time in urban America, prowling Blacks go around for fun to go target white people, that’s a fact. It’s happening more and more.” 

“If we would have said that Joy Reid and Michelle Obama and Sheila Jackson Lee and Ketanji Brown Jackson were affirmative action picks, we would have been called racistsNow they’re coming out and they’re saying it for us: ‘I am only here because of affirmative action.’ We know. You do not have the brain processing power to otherwise be taken really seriously. You had to go steal a white person’s slot to go be taken somewhat seriously.” 

When Kirk was speaking at a TPUSA Faith Event in 2023, “I think it’s worth it to have a cost of, unfortunately, some gun deaths every single year so that we can have the second amendment to protect our other God-given rights. That is a prudent deal. It is rational.” 

“The American Democrat party hates this country. They wanna see it collapse. They love it when America becomes less white.”  

“The great replacement strategywhich is well under way every single day in our southern border, is a strategy to replace white rural America with something different.” 

In addition, TPUSA has an ongoing professor watchlist, meant to instill fear in professors choosing to factually educate students on current events. Not only will TPUSA instill dangerous dialogue throughout our student body, but our professors now face surveillance over academic freedom, hindering many from fully teaching their material. 

Language like this can seem simple, but considered together with Kirk’s remarks, it is evident there is a negative connotation. This is what is yet to come, Vanderbilt.  

Clearly, there is no place for TPUSA on Vanderbilt’s campus, and its track record is derogatory in many respects. There has been a substantial amount of progress with free speech on campus, specifically through Dialogue Vanderbilt, to encourage students to have open dialogue on polarized issues. Vanderbilt College Republicans typically work together with student organizations, such as with Vanderbilt College Democrats, to debate openly. That is the beauty of cooperative politics. TPUSA would do the opposite. By freedom of speech, the organization means anything to make conservative ideologies louder than anything else. By conservative principles, they often come at the expense of marginalized communities. By American patriotism, it means reverting to traditional roles based on sex, race and sexuality, among many others.  

What makes you, the Vanderbilt community, think this behavior will not continue on our campus? Let this be a warning: TPUSA does not have the common interest of the entire Vanderbilt community in mind, but rather only those willing to fight against marginalized communities.  

I agree: political discourse on Vanderbilt’s campus should be encouraged and allowed; that is the privilege of attending a top university. However, this idea should be countered when an organization is known for misrepresenting underserved communities. As a result, TPUSA will deepen existing divisions on Vanderbilt’s diverse campus.  

Now what? 

The Center for the Defense of Academic Freedom offers students resources on how to best counteract newly established TPUSA chapters across college campuses. As one student body, we should have the bandwidth to protect the integrity of our campus community, away from dangerous organizations with hateful purposes. Organizations such as the newly established Young Democratic Socialists of America want to focus on “political education and advocacy on campus, as well as political participation and community service in the greater Nashville area.” Although claiming to be a “big-tent leftist club,” organizations like these genuinely want to fight for the common interests of all, no matter political affiliation.  

At the end of the day, counterprogramming aimed at uplifting the entire Vanderbilt community will prosper above dangerous agendas.  

I urge you all to use the presented facts and decide how to get involved. Stand behind organizations that truly value our Constitution, the First Amendment and the interests of our entire community.  

My final take? Turning Point USA has no place at Vanderbilt. 

About the Contributors
José Ruiz-Zepeda
José Ruiz-Zepeda, Opinion Editor
José Ruiz-Zepeda (‘27) is from Gainesville, Georgia, and is majoring in political science and saxophone performance in the Blair School of Music on the pre-law track. He previously served as Deputy News Editor and News Beat Head. When not writing for The Hustler, you can find him conducting the Spirit of Gold Marching Band during football games, hiking around Tennessee and studying for the LSAT. He can be reached at [email protected].
Chloe Pryor
Chloe Pryor, Former Staff Writer and Photographer
Chloe Pryor (‘26) is from Fort Smith, Ark., and triple majored in psychology, communications studies and law, history & society. When not writing for The Hustler, you can find her reading, drawing or running late for class. You can reach her at [email protected].
More to Discover