The official student newspaper of Vanderbilt University

The Vanderbilt Hustler

The official student newspaper of Vanderbilt University.
Since 1888
The official student newspaper of Vanderbilt University

The Vanderbilt Hustler

The official student newspaper of Vanderbilt University.
The official student newspaper of Vanderbilt University

The Vanderbilt Hustler

The official student newspaper of Vanderbilt University.

Chancellor Diermeier, Provost Raver criticize ‘incompetent’ U.S. News ranking methodology after drop in rank

Emails were sent to all students, faculty and alumni about the rank change.
Kirkland+Hall%2C+as+photographed+on+Aug.+21%2C+2020.+%28Hustler+Multimedia%2FHunter+Long%29
Hunter Long
Kirkland Hall, as photographed on Aug. 21, 2020. (Hustler Multimedia/Hunter Long)

Chancellor Daniel Diermeier and Provost C. Cybele Raver emailed students, alumni and faculty at around 9 a.m. CDT on Monday morning, criticizing the U.S. News Best National Universities ranking’s methodology and defending the university’s value. Vanderbilt, whose stated mission is to become a top-10 academic and research institution, dropped five spots to No. 18.

In the emails, Diermeier and Raver characterize the ranking system as “incompetent” and non-rigorous. They stated that changes to the ranking metrics — including removing emphasis on faculty expertise and students’ high school standing and increasing emphasis on social mobility — do not align with the university’s views on academic value. The pair echoed other administrators’ statements on U.S. News’ use of the U.S. Department of Education’s College Scorecard and Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS), claiming that this data misrepresents Vanderbilt and its student body.

“Vanderbilt is profoundly committed to offering access to qualified students from all backgrounds,” the pair’s email reads. “But it is deeply misleading for U.S. News to commingle this policy concern with measures of education quality.”

Dr. Jonathan Gilligan, professor of earth and environmental studies and civil and environmental engineering, said Diermeier and Raver’s emails demonstrate a need for the university to “do better.”

“I find it morally repugnant to say that promoting economic mobility is not a core part of any university’s educational mission, and to demand that a university not be judged by its performance in offering economic mobility,” Gilligan said. 

Dr. Dominique Baker, an associate professor of education policy at Southern Methodist University, also disapproved of Diermeier and Raver’s message regarding social mobility. Baker earned a Ph.D. in higher education leadership and policy studies from Vanderbilt, where she studied higher education access.

“This email is astounding to me both generally as a higher-ed-policy scholar but also as a graduate of Vanderbilt,” Baker told the Chronicle of Higher Education.

In their emails, Diermeier and Raver also stated that one of the “glaring” issues with U.S. News’ methodology is its refusal to include academic expenditures from VUMC with Vanderbilt’s expenditures despite the institutions sharing resources. Diermeier previously emphasized the legal separation of the two bodies when VUMC came under fire in September 2022 and June 2023 for its gender-affirming care and release of gender-affirming care patient records. 

Senior Induja Kumar, one of multiple students who criticized the university’s distant stance in relation to these issues, stated that Diermeier and Raver’s email about the U.S. News rankings demonstrates the bounds of principled neutrality

“If ‘VUMC makes such a significant contribution to our educational environment,’ I’d hope the university considers that the decisions the medical center makes affect students, not only when the conversation is about rankings but also under the duress of medical privacy concerns,” Kumar said in a message to The Hustler. “The Chancellor’s comments on the ranking are direct contradictions of his previous statements.” 

Junior Suhaah Nadir, president of FirstVU — a student organization dedicated to supporting first-generation college students at Vanderbilt, stated that more institutional emphasis should be placed on improving the resources available to disadvantaged students than defending the university against the ranking methodology.

“Of course, the U.S. News methodology isn’t perfect. But when it comes to supporting first-generation and low-income students at Vanderbilt, neither are we,” Nadir said. “Now more than ever, it is imperative that we as an institution prioritize our FGLI students. Not because it improves our rankings, but because we owe it to them.”

Like Nadir, Dr. James McFarland, director of undergraduate German studies, spoke to the irony surrounding university administrators’ critique of the ranking methodology. 

“When we drop five spots on the U.S. News & World rankings, suddenly the metrics aren’t to be trusted anymore because the methodology is biased against us,” McFarland said. “When we went up from 14 to 13 last year, we didn’t hear any of that, even though that was entirely the result of Columbia University being demoted for having forged its data, so everyone who had been below them lurched up a notch automatically.”

Sophomore Emma Rheanne said she felt the overall tone and message of Diermeier and Raver’s email to students was unprofessional.

“Schools that are worried about their rank need to be worried about their students, the activeness of organizations on campus, what good they are putting out into the community and what made them deserve 13 instead of 18 in the first place,” Rheanne said. “This rank change is not the end of the world for our school, and instead of disputing U.S. News, [it] should immediately go into repair internally.”   

Likewise, Jackson Davis (BS ‘23) stated that the email was in poor taste and speaks to the corporatization of higher education. 

“In the minds of the administration, Vanderbilt’s ‘prestige’ helps it attract students and grant funding, so rankings are relevant to them. That’s a fundamentally different mission than encouraging learning for learning’s sake, democratizing education, and supporting research for the sake of improving the human condition,” Davis said. 

Students at universities cited in Diermeier and Raver’s emails as also having dropped in ranks — such as the University of Chicago, Washington University in St. Louis and Tulane University — did not receive communications from university leaders. However, UChicago and Tulane both released statements that similarly criticized the ranking methodology. The email sent to faculty members differed slightly from those sent to students and alumni, adding criticisms of other major college ranking outlets — Forbes, The Wall Street Journal and Washington Monthly.  

“To the degree that they provide any value, we can point to the fact that we are one of just nine universities that place in the top 20 in all four,” the email to faculty members reads. 

Olivia Kew-Fickus, chief data officer and executive director of data & strategic analytics, will host separate faculty and community webinars about the rankings on Sept. 27 and 29, respectively. Diermeier and Raver stated in the emails that more statistics about Vanderbilt’s educational quality will be made available in light of the ranking.

View comments (5)
About the Contributors
Rachael Perrotta
Rachael Perrotta, Former Editor-in-Chief
Rachael Perrotta ('24) is from Cranston, R.I., and is majoring in cognitive studies, communication of science and technology and political science in Peabody College. She was previously Senior Advisor and News Editor. If she's not pressing you for a comment, she's probably trying to convince you that she's over 5 feet tall, cheering on the Red Sox or wishing Nashville had a beach. She can be reached at [email protected].
Hunter Long
Hunter Long, Former Multimedia Director
Hunter Long (’21) is from Austin, TX and double majored in molecular biology and medicine, health and society. He is an avid lover of film photography, good music and all things coffee. He can be reached at [email protected].    
More to Discover

Comments (5)

The Vanderbilt Hustler welcomes and encourages readers to engage with content and express opinions through the comment sections on our website and social media platforms. The Hustler reserves the right to remove comments that contain vulgarity, hate speech, personal attacks or that appear to be spam, commercial promotion or impersonation. The comment sections are moderated by our Editor-in-Chief, Rachael Perrotta, and our Social Media Director, Chloe Postlewaite. You can reach them at [email protected] and [email protected].
All The Vanderbilt Hustler picks Reader picks Sort: Newest
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
5 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
C
Class of 2022 grad
7 months ago

Honestly, this drop in ranking is completely deserved and expected. As much as administration wants to make others believe, Vanderbilt is not on the same level as its peers. The outcomes for Vanderbilt grads simply do not compare to the ivies and other elite institutions in the US. I graduated last year, and I still know tons of friends and other former classmates who have struggled to find jobs in this market, some of whom have been unemployed for over a year. I know this job market is tough, but I have not seen a student from an ivy league or a school like Duke, Rice, Georgia Tech, etc. struggle to find a place in the job market the way Vanderbilt grads have.

When you look at breaking into competitive industries such as big tech, Investment banking, etc. Vanderbilt grads don’t even come close compared to other higher ranked schools and peer institutions. The name brand is also non-existent beyond the South. I’m from the northeast and I’ve had several people tell me “I’ve never heard of that school, where is it?” Maybe instead of crying, the administration should do a better job at improving the institution and making outcomes better for students. Isn’t that what their new motto is all about?

J
J. Powers
7 months ago

You sound as bitter as Diermeier

R
Rich James
7 months ago

I think the President’s comments are misplaced. When I graduated five years ago I couldn’t get a good paying job and then discovered that the average salary for a Vanderbilt grad was far less than an Ivy League grad, which is who we think we are- let’s face it. But are we? Well at least Dartmouth is right alongside us but that’s a small consolation is Cornell in Columbia are far ahead now but their grades are earning a lot more. And their students are coming from a lot more modest families than ours. That’s where social mobility comes in they have pell grant students to get out and get great jobs here we have millionaires kids who get out and get OK jobs. Deidermeyer should be a little more humble in his role because that might play over in Germany but not in America. I doubt we’re going to be rewarded for his antics and insults towards US news.

A
Anonymous Faculty Memeber
8 months ago

“Incompetent and non-rigorous” are hollow terms that many academics often use in place of serious engagement with disagreement. Instead of throwing tantrums, Vanderbilt leadership should look at areas where it falls short and seek to improve. The world is ever changing. Crescere Aude, no?

A
Anon Staff
8 months ago

As a (now graduated) pell grant student, this email felt overwhelmingly disrespectful. One of the bullets essentially said they shouldn’t be penalized for having fewer Pell grant/first gen students. That the outcomes of students who receive financial aid isn’t a fair representation of the university. Why? Why not? Why do students of lower socioeconomic status matter less? I value about every student I interact with equally.