The official student newspaper of Vanderbilt University

The Vanderbilt Hustler

The official student newspaper of Vanderbilt University.
Since 1888
The official student newspaper of Vanderbilt University

The Vanderbilt Hustler

The official student newspaper of Vanderbilt University.
The official student newspaper of Vanderbilt University

The Vanderbilt Hustler

The official student newspaper of Vanderbilt University.

LETTER TO THE EDITOR: In response to Schulman, Drop. (out of writing for The Hustler.)

Dropping Greek Life doesn’t mean you dropped your misogyny, and you need to evaluate your role in rape culture.
The+new+NPHC+house+will+be+the+largest+on+Greek+row%2C+pictured+here+behind+the+recently+completed+Zeta+Tau+Alpha+house.+%28Photo+by+Hunter+Long%29
Hunter Long
The new NPHC house will be the largest on Greek row, pictured here behind the recently completed Zeta Tau Alpha house. (Photo by Hunter Long)

Editor’s Note: This piece contains mention of sexual violence/rape.

Dear Mr. Schulman,

I am writing an open letter to encourage your resignation from The Hustler staff on the heels of your latest article. Despite your seemingly best efforts to reform yourself and break your cognitive dissonance, it’s not enough. You still hold sexist, degrading opinions that you need to abolish. 

You say you were the Diversity & Inclusion Chair for your fraternity, and through this position, “worked with the Women’s Center and other diversity organizations to lead in-chapter discussions about rape culture, misogyny and racial/economic exclusivity in fraternities.” I have some questions for you about these discussions. Did you actually talk to any women? Any victims of rape? Any victims of rape by the hands of a drunk man? 

I am all three of these. I am a woman who was raped by a drunk man, and I am disgusted with you. You are perpetuating rape culture by your statements. Please listen.

Let’s get one thing straight before we begin. Rape is not a type of sex. Rape is objectification. Rape is a show of power that you can use a living, breathing person as your sexual gratification without their consent. Rape is a disregard for the rights and autonomy of another person. Rape is is the treatment of a person as only being a body for exploitation, not a human being with a mind and soul. It is one of the many forms of sexual violence, which is an umbrella term for any violent or coercive sexual act.

In contrast, sex only involves consenting, active and enthusiastic participants. Sex requires clear communication that all parties consent. If you find yourself disagreeing with this statement, then you need to seriously evaluate your prior sexual experiences, because you might be a rapist too. 

In your article, you say: “The drinking culture within fraternities—beer pong before the party, mixed drinks during—increases the probability that fraternity men are severely intoxicated during sexual interactions. Combine the aforementioned gender dynamic with the increased impulsiveness and reduced decision-making abilities of a brain flooded with alcohol, and you have an environment ripe for sexual abuse. Worse still, the alcohol-induced judgment inhibition that can cause men to make violent sexual advances also makes women less able to resist sexual violence.” 

Let’s be real with this paragraph. It functionally makes the argument that men become rapists when they get drunk. This is not true. Yes, drinking reduces inhibitions and impairs decision making. However, if you lose the mental fortitude that was previously stopping you from raping a person when you get drunk, it’s not because of the alcohol. It’s because of your own fucked-up vision of sex. 

Blaming alcohol for rape is rape culture. Don’t think I forgot your thinly-veiled attempt to victim blame with “alcohol-induced judgment inhibition … makes women less able to resist sexual violence.” Let’s get this straight: it is not the responsibility of persons who are at risk for sexual victimization to prevent themselves from becoming victims. It is the responsibility of every student on this campusof every human on this earthto ensure that anyone they are intending to have sexual relations with is comfortable, enthusiastic and consenting. 

Further through your article, you state: “When you view your fraternity membership as a transaction, you feel that you must get your return on investment, whatever the cost. I knew the relative ‘body counts’ of most of my brothers, and they knew mine. The feeling that one might have a low number fuels a sexual insecurity that can only be rectified with sex—again, whatever the cost.”

Here, you say the word “sex” when you mean the word “rape.” “Sex” at “whatever the cost” is not sex. That is rape. I don’t care if you feel entitled to sex because you paid thousands of dollars of fraternity. I don’t care if you feel left out because your “bros” have had sex with more girls than you. You are NEVER entitled to sex.

You say, “I’ve tried to make reform. I really have.” But how hard did you try? While you were the Diversity and Inclusion chair, you bragged to your own brothers about your body count. You still perpetuate rape culture through your belief that alcohol causes sexual violence. By your own admission, you primarily joined a frat to have sex with women and didn’t leave until it was clear that there would be no parties to meet women at during your senior year due to COVID-19. Don’t try to take credit where credit is not due. You say you tried to enact reform in your fraternity but evidently didn’t even take the first step to reform yourself. You have a lot of work to do to “drop” your disgusting attitude towards women and rape culture. 

You say you tried to enact reform in your fraternity but evidently didn’t even take the first step to reform yourself. You have a lot of work to do to “drop” your disgusting attitude towards women and rape culture. 

I know you believe very strongly in freedom of speech, as do I. However, I also believe in listening to experts and not talking over those who have been silenced in the past. Many of your articles have pushed out the voices of people more qualified to speak on the matters you discuss. “Drop.” is an especially heinous example in which you try to absolve yourself of any guilt from being involved in IFC, while simultaneously trying to co-opt the Abolish Greek Life movement, which is not your creation. You discuss your own fraternity’s misogyny as if you were not complicit in the sexism and sexual violence through your own overt sexism. (I mean, “sexual FOMO”? Seriously?) There is a place for people like you in journalism, however, you are not prepared to fill it. You are making The Hustler, and by extension, Vanderbilt, look bad at every turn. It’s time for you to apologize to those who you have hurt and drop out of The Hustler staff.

View comments (14)
About the Contributor
Hunter Long
Hunter Long, Former Multimedia Director
Hunter Long (’21) is from Austin, TX and double majored in molecular biology and medicine, health and society. He is an avid lover of film photography, good music and all things coffee. He can be reached at [email protected].    
More to Discover

Comments (14)

The Vanderbilt Hustler welcomes and encourages readers to engage with content and express opinions through the comment sections on our website and social media platforms. The Hustler reserves the right to remove comments that contain vulgarity, hate speech, personal attacks or that appear to be spam, commercial promotion or impersonation. The comment sections are moderated by our Editor-in-Chief, Rachael Perrotta, and our Social Media Director, Chloe Postlewaite. You can reach them at [email protected] and [email protected].
All The Vanderbilt Hustler picks Reader picks Sort: Newest
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
14 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
A
Ana
3 years ago

Thalia, reading your article after Schulman’s was very cathartic as you articulated so clearly every problem with his article. Your bravery inspires me. It is disappointing to see so many other commenters who have so clearly not done their due diligence of thoroughly reading Schulman’s article and, in turn, continue to make excuses for him and berate you on the severity of your sentiments directed at him. As another commenter stated earlier, someone had to say what you wrote in this article and I’m so thankful you did. I am interest to see if/when and how Schulman responds to your article and hope he takes responsibility. Thank you for putting the pressure on him to do so as it is much needed and nobody else, including Hustler, are doing so.

J
j
3 years ago

I largely agree with Thalia: the use of the word “sex” in place of rape is symbolic of a much larger systemic issue in rape culture. In my humble opinion, then, Max should acknowledge those faults in his argument as perpetuating this issue. My respect for him is pretty conditional therein. However, in coordination with what several other comments here have said, to call him a possible rapist (while not inherently untrue, I suppose, contingent on how aggressively you read it?) mitigates the article as a whole by turning it into a non-virtuous ad hominem — lacking virtue not on the basis of its anger, but on the basis of its applying arguably the worst possible misnomer imaginable to the defendant. “Rapist” is not a word that can be casually applied to someone, which I believe is what the previous comment was discussing with regards to “wokeness”… the linguistic discounting of such grave terms (including several others quite evident on social media at the moment) are seemingly irrefutable when said (I mean, how can you defend a possible rapist?) but in truth betray the real abhorrent nature of the term (because in this case most men are possible rapists, but I would not suggests we expunge The Hustler of most men).

R
RBI
3 years ago

The phrase “you might be a rapist too” in direct reference to a named Vanderbilt student could equate to a false rape allegation and should not have been posted on a public platform.

Issues of journalistic integrity and proper vetting procedure aside, it is morally irresponsible to allow language this damaging – and more importantly, completely unsubstantiated – to make it to print.

The Hustler should issue a retraction for this section of the article and reevaluate the newspaper’s policy on libelous statements when posting LTTEs or opinion pieces in the future.

C
Chris
3 years ago

Thalia, thank you for sharing this perspective. Mine is of a man who, like Max, has been surrounded by these cultures and disturbed by them: more disturbed, that is, by our participation in them than the systems themselves. Max’s writing indicates this thoroughly, and he points to examples framing the toxicity of fraternity culture. You have every right to be angered, upset, and provoked emotionally in any way by these accounts which so heinously affected your life. You are right, and Max knows it. I am glad you voiced your passion here, for all should hear it, but I believe a man publicly calling attention to the issue, more than most of us can claim, is not the bearer of a “disgusting attitude towards women and rape culture.” The piece could have been worded more sensitively where you noted so, but we should welcome all voices joining a movement rather than accusing them of co-opting it.

M
Minnie Mangafas
3 years ago

Obviously the disconnect in between the two perspectives in question is staunch. Thalia is correct that in many areas Max shows a serious lack of education/common sense when it comes to recognizing & addressing sexual violence. “Rape” and “sex” should not be used interchangeably. While I think what Max is trying to say is that drunkenness does heighten the chance that miscommunications during sex take place, his position is both underdeveloped and unreflective. In no way do these “miscommunications” meet the level of sexual violence and trauma that folks reference in discussions of rape and rape culture. In his article, Max mistakenly implies throughout and even outright says, in the portions that Thalia quotes, they do. This is a major fallacy that underlies many men’s perception of sex, across society, let alone in the binary system of Greek and non-Greek. Nobody gets drunk and suddenly becomes a violent, disrespectful, sadistic person. It doesn’t take a scholar or a genius to realize this. This is common sense.

To Max, when your brothers get “too drunk”, they may get too sloppy, too careless, etc. But any of them who ended up on the instituting end of a rape do not have alcohol to blame. The # of men who are actually sexual predators is 2 in 100 (I believe…I’m trying to conjure a stat I learned in freshman year, 2016). This number is responsible for the 20% of women in college who suffer sexual violence. Do with that reality what you will. Also, I do not really understood Max’s argument about women’s inebriation, either. But given the all-over-the-place quality of the points he made that I just addressed, it appears that Max doesn’t entirely understand what he’s trying to say either.

For this reason, I think this article is wrong in its direction and spirit towards Max. Clearly, Max is coming from a place of misperception, both to himself, and others. I know Max fairly superficially, and from those encounters, I assume he will probably read these comments and this article and go back to Project Safe and ask them to teach him more, because he clearly didn’t get it the first time. This article is correct in instructing him to do that. But to suggest he should resign from the staff, when he otherwise uploads interesting and well-researched pieces, is not a mature way to further the growth of a peer. Just because Max has a misunderstanding of the circumstances that lead to and surround rape does not equate him to an actual rapist. The reasons that rapists get away with it will not be solved by publicly shaming Max and grouping misinformed, well-meaning people like him with the minority of predators that evade consequences and wreak havoc.

All in all, I completely understand that Max’s article was aggravating to read, not just because it is littered with misinformation and bad takes, but those can seriously unsettle individuals like Thalia with a more personal stake in the topic at hand and who obviously has a more mature, well-developed, and intellectually advanced perspective of the realities surrounding rape culture. Unfortunately, Max’s predicament and his assessment of it reflects a majority of your male peers’ ideas and beliefs. Once again, hopefully he goes back to Project Safe and takes some friends this time. But having the wrong idea doesn’t make someone a bad person, so there’s no reason to treat him like one.

L
lecoq
3 years ago

@Carlissa
“No one cares if Max has good intentions, if you and him are unwilling to take criticism than you are only reinforcing the validity in her article.”

Then*

M
MS
3 years ago

“You need to seriously evaluate your prior sexual experiences, because you might be a rapist too.”

There are some good points in this piece, but that quote can’t go to print. It just can’t. Shame on The Hustler.

-
---
3 years ago

Powerful writing, Thalia. Someone needed to say it, and you said it perfectly.

J
Jiaqi Li
3 years ago

I agree with most points Irwin made. What Schulman had said does indeed substitute “sex” for “rape” where it is improper to do so. Vandy has plenty of information all around campus about the importance of consent in sex. To willfully ignore the definition of sex that we know includes consent is to promote rape culture. Regardless of what Schulman has privately done in and outside of the fraternity, he has and still does purposefully misinterpret what rape actually is. Alcohol does not make anyone a rapist like Schulman insinuates. The conscious decision and intention to coerce someone into sleeping with you under the influence of alcohol while knowing they cannot give consent makes someone a rapist. Rapists are rapists and men are men.

I do believe Schulman should be given a chance to apologize or make amends. Not only to all the people who identify as men that he insinuated can easily become rapists, but also to all the people who were raped. He purposefully misinterpreted the definition of something that hurt and violated them, in order to shift the blame of the crime to the alcohol or the system, anything but personal behavior.

C
Carlissa
3 years ago

@Thalia
I am proud of you and this was very a very brave and thorough article. Thank you for sharing and applying pressure on the Hustle to hold its writers accountable.
@Dove
You and Max are apart of problem. It’s not about being woke. Thalia is a victim and you are completely derailing her message to make yourself feel above the “woke” movement. What is the “woke” movement? Holding people accountable for their words that uphold a racist and sexist rape culture? Max’s language excuses men’s actions as a symptom of the conditions of frat party culture and not the toxic insecurity and abuse of power over people’s bodies. Sexual Trauma does not give a d*mn about your “genuine effort”. No one cares if Max has good intentions, if you and him are unwilling to take criticism than you are only reinforcing the validity in her article.

-
-
3 years ago

Firstly, I should say that I am so incredibly sorry that you have experienced rape and again hope that the perpetrator has been punished. But this article is an incredible overreach and so deeply flawed. Any employer who googles Max’s name will now be led to an article that in parts insinuates that Max is an actual rapist, written by a person who (I’m assuming) has never even met him. In what place are you to recommend that he drop out of the staff for writing a controversial article as you write a personal attack on a man you quite obviously know nothing about. Is that what free speech means to you? If you had met him, you would know that Max is extremely adamant about consent, and would so obviously agree with you that sex only occurs between two actively consenting members, but you chose to project your trauma and state “you might be a rapist yourself.” Some of the other statements that are just insane jumps are “you say the word ‘sex’ when you mean the word ‘rape'” and “didn’t leave until it was clear that there would be no parties to meet women at.” Neither of these are even close to logical or evidence based. While I think Max could’ve been a little bit clearer in his wording, you’re making huge assumptions and missing major points of his article. In no place does Max say he feels entitled to sex just for joining a fraternity. He says that Greek life events are good places to meet girls which may in turn lead to sex (true). He also states that Greek life and the binge drinking culture at parties where the number of girls vastly outnumbers the boys creates a culture that could lead to sexual abuse. I see absolutely no fault in this, largely because both Greek life and alcohol are involved in huge numbers of sexual assault cases. I am absolutely astonished such a personal attack has been posted by the Hustler. I also want to second the other comment that this type of directed hate is going to completely undermine the movement of abolish greek life. No other fraternity member has given such an honest account from the inside, acknowledging the amount of issues that abound within the organizations. Although I can see how maybe his voice shouldn’t be elevated, he also perhaps was using his privilege and platform to further the conversation and hopefully convince others to drop as well.

D
Dove
3 years ago

Ironic to write a piece full of vulgarity and personal attacks, when I’m not allowed to do so in this comment. If you really think Schulman’s article is an issue worth addressing (you’re a little late to the party anyways…) it seems to be missing the point. This article shows more than anything how the “woke” movement will eat itself alive at every level… really sad and disheartening to see divisiveness and accusations (“you might be a rapist yourself”) get in the way of genuine effort to make change

-
-
3 years ago

Yeah so I really don’t agree with Max but there are a lot of issues with your logic, Thalia. I grieve for what happened to you and I hope that the sick [expletive] got the punishment they deserved, but you are painting Max as a rapist himself. I understand that there is a true link between perpetuating rape culture and being a rapist, but they are not equal.

Alcohol does indeed cause more drunk encounters at parties but that does not mean that he is a rapist and should be “canceled.” I don’t really think you read this article. He never said that he joined a fraternity get girls drunk and rape them. He said that he joined to meet girls at parties. There are just a lot of jumps and this article is not fair to him in this respect.

I think his article was really messed up but if someone only reads your letter, they will be deprived of the truth. Please do not project your trauma onto a boy that is not to blame. That being said, I don’t like Schulman GTBAZ

J
Jess
3 years ago

Mac is going to read this and think he’s being bullied because he’s a “good guy.” News flash: When you see yourself as “one of the good ones“ you absolve yourself of any responsibility. Take a long deep look at yourself and try to see why you’re getting backlash. Your logic and entire way of speech reeks of misogyny. If this is your attempt at being woke I’m horrified to know what went on behind closed doors before you dropped.