Matt’s Traditional American Values: In Defense of the Nashville Statement

Matt's Traditional American Values

By Matt Colleran

Sep 11, 2017

Recently, members of the Southern Baptist Convention (SBC) and other Evangelical leaders released a statement–titled the ‘Nashville Statement’–that reaffirms the traditional Christian teachings on sex and marriage. Following the statement, some liberal leaders including Nashville Mayor Megan Barry criticized the statement, especially claiming that the positions reflected in the statement were not shared by all Nashvillians. Even the editor of the Hustler, Sarah Friedman, published a letter from the editor that criticized Vanderbilt for not condemning the Nashville Statement. I would have criticized the school for taking a stance on a controversial issue (as it wrongly did following recent developments with DACA and Title IX policies), but the Nashville Statement fundamentally does not affect anyone who is not a Southern Baptist. It is not trying to set a policy for all of Nashville, but is a reference to the fact that it was made in Nashville, the headquarters of the SBC.

Nothing in the Nashville Statement prevents gays and lesbians from living their lives as they choose. Nothing in it even has any impact on the lives of non-Southern Baptists; even for Southern Baptists, it largely just reaffirms long-standing beliefs. Regardless of your social and religious views, it is true that the Bible condemns homosexuality (Leviticus 18:22, among other verses). Our culture, however, is not always one that aligns with traditional Christian values. I do personally believe that homosexuality is wrong (NOTE: this does not mean that all homosexuals are bad people), but I and other Southern Baptists have no intention of criminalizing homosexuality. The same applies to other issues- I strongly believe that casual sex and hook-up culture are deeply immoral and disgusting, but you don’t see me trying to stop people from doing the wrong thing at some frat party.

What I do ask is that my rights be respected. It is such a tragedy that we live in a world where good Christian bakers, florists, photographers, and other wedding personnel are being prosecuted for their beliefs on marriage. It is upsetting to me that I am even having to write this article. The Nashville Statement should have been a non-issue; my fellow Southern Baptists should be able to go to our churches and live out our lives in accordance with our faith–just as gays and lesbians can live theirs, as long as it does not interfere with anyone else’s life. We do not have to agree with each other’s lifestyles and we should always try to shape the culture with our faith and values. We can disagree with each other, but no one should try to stop Christians from living out Christian lives (and I won’t stop you from living yours either).

About the Contributor

Matt Colleran, Former Author

Comments (1)

The Vanderbilt Hustler welcomes and encourages readers to engage with content and express opinions through the comment sections on our website and social media platforms. The Hustler reserves the right to remove comments that contain vulgarity, hate speech, personal attacks or that appear to be spam, commercial promotion or impersonation. The comment sections are moderated by our Editor-in-Chief, Barrie Barto, and the rest of our editorial team. You can reach Barrie at [email protected].

Share your thoughts...

All The Vanderbilt Hustler picks Reader picks Sort: Newest

1 Comment

Newest

Oldest Most Voted

Inline Feedbacks

View all comments

Minnie Mangafas

7 years ago

Hi Matt,

While it may be technically true that the title of the Nashville Statement is a memo of the SBC’s location, it also carries the implication that the statement is on behalf of the Nashville community – we’d both agree that implication is wrong. You even said yourself, our mayor disagreed with it, so did the editor-in-chief of Nashville’s premier university’s newspaper, and our university and city in many ways are leaps ahead of this statement in terms of social progressivism. We’ve both read the paper, so I agree with you – on face values, it can seem like it’s not trying to convert anyone. But even if that’s true, it doesn’t mean the beliefs mentioned in this paper aren’t motivating others to keep harming people in our country and around the world. More than that, many stipulations in this paper are objectively false. Many of the world’s top religious authorities have reconciled their faith with the science framing the human experience. How can you support a paper that believes Adam and Eve were literally the world’s first humans when your own university spends millions of dollars for cutting edge research about the natural world? If the SBC rejects truth in that way, might it not also be wrong about its views on the expression of sexuality? Finally, I’m disturbed by its “donate” section. Donate to what? It says for pastors to reinforce their churches’ views on marriage and sexuality. Why exactly do they need donations to do that? What kind of resources? Can we be assured donations won’t go into funding conversion therapies or Sunday school curriculums causing psychological harm to a kid who might be gay or lesbian? It’s easy to say this paper does’t want to convert anyone but its effects are clearly intended to reach beyond Articles 1-14.