President Donald Trump’s administration sent letters last night to nine universities, including Vanderbilt, asking them to sign a 10-point “Compact for Academic Excellence in Higher Education,” according to The Wall Street Journal. The compact lays out a set of guidelines for universities to follow in exchange for “multiple positive benefits” that include “substantial and meaningful federal grants.”
Chancellor Daniel Diermeier told The Hustler that the university is reviewing the compact but declined to comment further.
Demands listed in the document include capping international undergraduate student enrollment at 15%, freezing tuition for five years, requiring applicants to take standardized tests, limiting grade inflation, adhering to strict definitions of gender and banning the use of race or sex in hiring and admissions. The compact also stipulates that universities whose endowment exceeds $2 million per undergraduate student should provide free tuition to students in “hard science” programs.
As of Spring 2025, Vanderbilt has 772 undergraduate and 992 graduate and professional international students, which is below the 15% threshold of undergraduate international students laid out in the compact. Vanderbilt is currently test optional through Fall 2027, meaning applicants are not currently required to submit ACT or SAT scores. Vanderbilt’s $10.2 billion endowment does not exceed the $2 million per undergraduate student threshold for granting free tuition to students studying hard sciences.
In addition to Vanderbilt, letters were sent to Brown University, Dartmouth College, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, the University of Arizona, the University of Pennsylvania, the University of Southern California, the University of Texas at Austin and the University of Virginia. May Mailman, senior adviser for special projects at the White House, told the WSJ that the White House chose these nine universities because it believed they could be good “actors.”
“They have a president who is a reformer or a board that has really indicated they are committed to a higher-quality education,” Mailman said.
William Doyle, professor of public policy and higher education, said the compact follows the historical pattern of the federal government tying funding to policy compliance. He added that university leaders deciding whether to sign the compact need to consider if they can pursue their mission within the constraints of the compact.
Doyle said the novelty in this compact comes from the requirement for university administrators to interfere with academic freedom in a couple of ways. The first requirement he cited was that universities that sign the compact must “use public accountability mechanisms to demonstrate their commitment to grade integrity.”
“This condition subjects faculty decisions about grading to governmental scrutiny and would likely be contrary to the commitments made to academic freedom in university faculty manuals,” Doyle said.
Doyle further added that the compact would require university administrations to interfere with academic freedom in the area of peer review. The compact requires that signatories commit to and seek out a broad spectrum of viewpoints in every area of the university.
“For faculty, this would require judging colleagues for hiring, reappointment or promotion not only on their professional qualifications but also on their ‘viewpoint,’” Doyle said. “Peer review for the purposes of hiring, reappointment and promotion is central to academic freedom, and the compact would place these decisions under government scrutiny — something without recent precedent.”
Doyle emphasized that his comments are made solely in his capacity as an academic researcher and are not about Vanderbilt in particular.
The document also discusses campus political climate and asks schools to abolish departments that “purposefully punish, belittle, and even spark violence against conservative ideas.”
Junior Samuel Bodwell, president of Vanderbilt College Republicans, said he thinks Vanderbilt falls in line with most of the principles and that not much would change for students if Vanderbilt were to sign the compact.
“President Trump is applying his America First agenda in this instance by reframing how universities are treated by the federal government,” Bodwell said. “His opposition to affirmative action and DEI remains a clear priority, and his proposal of freezing tuition will hopefully slow the extreme financial burden students face during and after college.”
In a statement to The Hustler, junior Drew Spiegel, co-president of Vanderbilt College Democrats, urged the university not to sign the compact.
“Our concerns with the compact extend far beyond its specific policies: it’s the principle. While we even agree with some of its policies, specifically the tuition freeze, this is the wrong way to implement institutional changes,” Spiegel said. “What’s at stake is nothing less than the university’s independence from tyrannical federal overreach.”
Spiegel added that he believes the sincerity of the university’s institutional neutrality policy is being tested.
“There is nothing principled or neutral about surrendering to these demands. Does Vanderbilt believe in its own values?” Spiegel said. “We understand the critical importance of federal funding to our university’s mission, but our integrity is not for sale. The moral response to authoritarianism is not appeasement. It is courage.”
According to the New York Times, the University of Texas at Austin is the only university that has responded to request for comment. The chairman of the university’s Board of Regents told the NYT that the University of Texas system is “honored” to be among the nine universities chosen by Trump.



BA 1998 • Oct 6, 2025 at 8:38 pm CDT
I think being included in this invitation reflects well on Vanderbilt – an opinion many recent graduates may find disagreeable. Speaking as someone who graduated summa cum laude over 30 years ago, however, and setting aside the TDS element for a moment, however, the idea of capping tuition increases for a set period of time, focusing on meritocratic principles for admission (which are, by the way, now the law of the land based on recent Supreme Court precedent), and having an openness to civil discourse across disciplines (which Vanderbilt, under Dr. Diermeier’s admirable leadership, has already embraced) seem to me to be laudable goals, particularly if coupled with federal financial support. I urge the administration – and ultimately the Board of Trustees – to consider this proposal carefully.
SR 2029 • Oct 8, 2025 at 1:16 pm CDT
Nobody (reasonable) disagrees with capping tuition, meritocracy, and civil discourse. The issue with this compact mainly is the federal government’s intervention in issues that do not concern them- for example the definition of sex and gender. Why should the federal government get to say how college students should identify? Why does the compact want to disallow speech that goes against only “conservative” values? Why would we want to cap international student enrollment, don’t we want the best and brightest? It’s important to think critically about what this administration is really wanting from this compact (more control over universities) and to look past what simply looks beneficial from the outside.
John Long • Oct 11, 2025 at 8:54 am CDT
Not sure how you don’t see the laughable absurdity of the *Trump administration* calling for “civil discourse,” but you’re also missing the point of this “offer” which is clearly extortion.
Shirley Bowman • Oct 3, 2025 at 10:24 pm CDT
Although I am not directly involved with Vanderbilt University I value freedoms such as free speech, free expression and exchange of ideas and opinions and independence for institutions of higher education. I would be extremely disappointed if Vanderbilt were to cave in to the authoritarian regime of the Trump administration whether or not it would mean financial loss or hardship for the university.
Roy Blount Jr • Oct 3, 2025 at 6:45 pm CDT
I’ve entrusted my papers — 62 years’ worth beginning with Hustler editorials — to my alma mater, where I learned to love great writing and the vigorous values of a free country. Now I’m trusting that Vanderbilt will find a way to reject this overbearing, pernicious deal put forward by the Ttump administration.
Roy Blount Jr, class of ’63
Anne McNaron • Oct 30, 2025 at 8:00 pm CDT
Well said Roy.
As a fellow alumna, I was dismayed to see that Vanderbilt was not one of the 9 who rejected the “offer” and respectfully ask the Board and Chancellor to do so.
BS ’84
John Long • Oct 3, 2025 at 4:25 pm CDT
So the fact that the Chancellor refused to join the 600+ university and college presidents who signed a statement opposing the Trump administration’s assault on higher education did him no good at all. They came for Vanderbilt, anyway.
SandraH • Oct 3, 2025 at 1:57 pm CDT
I don’t for a minute think Vanderbilt or any other university should capitulate to this authoritarian administration. Having said that I would have loved to know what “multiple positive benefits” including “substantial and meaningful federal grants” are being offered. Perhaps a FOIA request is in order.
John Long • Oct 3, 2025 at 4:26 pm CDT
The “offer” basically amounts to, “Nice university you got there. Be a shame if something happened to it.”
Sarah F • Oct 3, 2025 at 8:06 am CDT
What can Vanderbilt alumni do to voice how strongly we do not support the university signing this letter? We are proud to be Commodores because free speech, diversity of thought, and critical thinking were core tenets of our education. Signing this letter would be a dangerous act for those values in our country and would threaten the success of this university providing quality education to the next generations.
Caleb • Oct 3, 2025 at 12:06 pm CDT
There is a petition going around from Vanderbilt Graduate Workers United for students, faculty, staff, alumni, donors, and community members to sign.
Thomas • Oct 4, 2025 at 6:21 am CDT
Call the Chancellor’s office and leave a message that you strongly oppose cooperation with an authoritarian regime. I added that having a Chancellor who grew up under the shadow of the Berlin Wall sign a compact to essential join a Vichy academic conference would compound a shame that Vanderbilt would never recover from.